Outputs
Outputs
Use the filter below to find what you're looking for:
Exploring the ongoing development and impact of Clinical Commissioning Groups
The over-arching aim of the second phase of this project is to explore the impacts of CCGs, with a particular focus upon the potential added value that clinicians bring to the commissioning process (in its widest sense), and to elucidate the contexts and factors that enable or inhibit the delivery of these benefits.
PHOENIX: Public Health and Obesity in England – the New Infrastructure Examined – First interim report: the scoping review
The PHOENIX project aims to examine the impact of structural changes to the health and care system in England on the functioning of the public health system, and on the approaches taken to improving the public’s health.
Local histories and local sensemaking: a case of policy implementation in the English National Health Service
Coleman A, Checkland K, & Harrison S. (2014). In Michael Hill (Ed.), Studying Public Policy: An international approach. (pp. 209-220). Bristol: Policy Press.
Health and Wellbeing Boards: a new type of partnership?
We examined issues and the early development of HWBs in our recently published article in Local Government Studies.
Joining it up? Health and Wellbeing in the new English National Health Service organisation: Early evidence from Clinical Commissioning Groups and shadow Health and Wellbeing Boards
Coleman A, Checkland K, Segar I, McDermott I, Harrison S and Peckham S (2014). Local Government Studies, 40(4), 560-580. DOI:10.1080/03003930.2013.841578
Accountable to whom, for what? An exploration of the early development of Clinical Commissioning Groups in the English NHS
Checkland K, Allen P, Segar J, Coleman A, McDermott I, Harrison S, Petsoulas C and Peckham S (2013). BMJ Open, 3, e003769. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003769
Primary care-led commissioning: applying lessons from the past to the early development of clinical commissioning groups in England
Checkland K, Coleman A, McDermott I, Segar J, Miller R, Pestoulas C, Wallace A, Harrison S, Peckham S and Osipovic D (2013). British Journal of General Practice 63(614), e611-e619.
The use of financial incentives to help improve health outcomes: is the quality and outcomes framework fit for purpose? A systematic review
Langdown C, and Peckham S. (2013). Journal of Public Health. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt077.
Divergence of NHS choice policy in the UK: What difference has patient choice policy in England made
Sanderson M, Allen P, Peckham S et al (2013). Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 18(4), 202-208.
Personal Budgets, Choice and Health: A Review of International Evidence from 11 OECD Countries
Gadsby, E., Segar, J., Allen, P., Checkland, K., Coleman, A., McDermott, I. & Peckham, S (2013). International Journal of Public & Private Healthcare Management and Economics, 3(3-4), 15. DOI: 10.4018/ijpphme.2013070102
Co-operation and conflict under hard and soft contracting regimes: case studies from England and Wales
Hughes, D., Allen, P., Doheny, S., Petsoulas, C., Vincent-Jones, P. (2013). BMC Health Services Research 13(Suppl 1):S1.
The limits of market-based reforms in the NHS: the case of alternative providers in primary care
Coleman, A., Checkland, K., McDermott, I., & Harrison, S. (2013). BMC health services research, 13(Suppl 1), S3.
Understanding the work done by NHS commissioning managers: An exploration of the microprocesses underlying day-to-day sensemaking in UK primary care organisations
Checkland, K., Harrison, S., Snow, S., Coleman, A., & McDermott, I. (2013). Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(2), 149-170.
Does Hospital Ownership Affect Patient Experience? An Investigation into Public-Private Sector Differences In England
Perotin, V., Zamora, B., Reeves, R., Bartlett, W., Allen, P. (2013). Journal of Health Economics 32 (3), 633-646.
An economic analysis of the limits of market based reforms in the English NHS
Allen, P. (2013). BMC Health Services Research 13(Suppl 1):S1.